Peer Review Process

Vagisha International Multidisciplinary Research Journal follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, relevance, and academic integrity of all published manuscripts. In this process, the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential to maintain objectivity and impartiality.

All submitted manuscripts are evaluated through multiple stages, including initial editorial screening, peer review by subject experts, revision, and final editorial decision. The journal adheres strictly to COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) guidelines at every stage of the review process.

Review Stages

  1. Manuscript Submission
    Authors submit their manuscript through the journal’s official email or submission system.

  2. Initial Editorial Screening
    The editorial team checks the manuscript for:

    • Scope and relevance

    • Originality and plagiarism

    • Formatting and compliance with journal guidelines

    Manuscripts failing to meet basic requirements may be rejected at this stage.

  3. Double-Blind Peer Review
    Suitable manuscripts are sent to two independent subject experts for double-blind peer review. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on:

    • Research originality and contribution

    • Methodology and analysis

    • Clarity of presentation

    • Ethical compliance

  4. Reviewer Recommendations
    Reviewers submit one of the following recommendations:

    • Accept

    • Minor Revision

    • Major Revision

    • Reject

  5. Author Revision
    Authors revise the manuscript based on reviewer comments and resubmit within the stipulated time.

  6. Final Editorial Decision
    The Editor-in-Chief or Editorial Board makes the final decision based on reviewer reports and revised submissions.

  7. Acceptance and Publication
    Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting, proofreading, and online publication.

Peer Review Process Flow Chart